NewThe autonomous auditing operating system

Audit work, structured for the AI era.

Punchcard turns every request, test, and review step into a structured unit of audit work. Send a punchcard to a client. An agent completes it. You review it. Together they make the audit.

Built for external and internal audit and their clients. SOC 2 certified. GDPR-aligned.

Punchcard
New Request
Activity Feed
CoAudit
Templates
Clients
Engagements
Acme Holdings — FY26
Bluestone Industries
Northwind Mfg.
Settings
LaVell Edwards & Co/Financial Statement Audit
Requests60
Tasks15
Accounts Receivable3
56
Subsequent Cash Receipts
412
57
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Analysis
55
AR Aging
3
Expenses & Liabilities6
35
Operating Expenses Testing
18
83
Search for Unrecorded Liability
214
91
Debt Testing
72
Debt Agreements
1
73
Debt Amortization Schedules
33
Premiums Testing
Accounts Payable3
69
Accrued Liabilities Support
68
Subsequent Disbursements
67
AP Aging
Payroll & Employee Benefits5
88
Investment Allocation Testing
30
16
Payroll Testing
9
Mar 30
20
Remittance Testing
9
Apr 25
71
Employee Listing
13
Payroll Registers
1
Feb 19
Prepaids and Other Assets1
Daniel AlbersonLease schedule — Northwind Casper warehouse
Build me an ASC 842 amortization schedule from this lease. Straight-line, 7-year term, monthly payments. Use the discount rate I gave you (5.25%).
LeaseAgreement_Northwind_Casper.pdf
pdf · 218 KB
Worked for 12.7s · 1 doc · 11 citations

Done. Extracted the lease terms from §3–§5 of the agreement and built the schedule.

Lease terms I pulled

  • Lessor: Northwind Industrial Properties, LLC
  • Premises: 4119 Industrial Pkwy, Casper, WY 82604 — 28,400 sq ft warehouse
  • Commencement: Jan 1, 2025 · Term: 7 years (84 months)
  • Base rent: $42,600/month, escalating 3.0% annually
  • Discount rate: 5.25% (per your input — IBR)

Day-1 measurement

  • Lease liability (PV of payments): $3,094,812
  • ROU asset: $3,094,812
  • Classification under ASC 842-10-25-2: Operating

What's in the workbook

  • `Inputs` — assumptions, change any cell and the schedule recalcs
  • `Schedule` — 84 monthly rows with payment · interest · principal · ROU amort
  • `Annual Summary` — rolled up by FY for trial-balance tie-out
  • `JE Templates` — month-1 initial recognition + recurring monthly JE
Lease_Schedule_Northwind_ASC842.xlsx
excel · 47 KB
Suggested follow-ups
Ask anything…
Citations
Co-Audit Agent is in beta
LaVell Edwards & Co/Financial Statement Audit/D24-80 · Revenue and COGS Testing
Request
Workpaper
Memo
Sample
Assertions
#
Project Code
SKU
Rev. Date
Revenue
COGS
Existence
Cutoff
Accuracy
Classification
1
CP-241029-TECH
NMC811
11/27/24
19,530.00
17,112.00
2
CP-241029-TECH
BMS800V
11/27/24
3,672.90
3,218.16
3
CP-241029-TECH
THERMKIT
11/27/24
889.35
779.24
4
CP-241029-TECH
PRECCIRC
11/27/24
707.70
620.08
5
CP-241231-AERO
NMC811
01/06/25
12,684.50
11,116.00
6
CP-241108-AERO
CHARGEMOD
12/04/24
4,415.20
3,869.60
7
CP-241108-AERO
BMS800V
12/04/24
1,836.45
1,609.08
8
CP-241221-MARINE
NMC811
01/15/25
24,412.50
21,390.00
9
CP-241221-MARINE
THERMKIT
01/15/25
1,778.70
1,558.48
10
CP-250108-DEFENSE
NMC811
02/05/25
32,550.00
28,520.00
11
CP-250108-DEFENSE
BMS800V
02/05/25
7,345.80
6,436.32
12
CP-250108-DEFENSE
CHARGEMOD
02/05/25
3,150.00
2,760.00
Row 5 · Cutoff
AnswerCutoff misstatement
Goods shipped December 31, 2024 but revenue recorded in January 2025 — under the contract's EXW shipping terms, title transferred on Dec 31, so $12,684.50 should be recognized in FY24, not FY25.
Reasoning
Invoice INV-2087 ship date is Dec 31, 2024 p. 1 — falls in FY24, but the GL JE date is Jan 6, 2025 (FY25).
Contract terms are EXW Casper, WY p. 1 — under ASC 606 / IFRS 15, control transfers to the buyer at shipment, so revenue must be recognized on Dec 31, 2024.
Invoice amount $12,684.50 p. 1 ties to the recorded JE — only the period is incorrect, not the value.
!Impact: FY24 revenue is understated by $12,684.50; FY25 is overstated by the same amount. Propose AJE to reclassify.
Sources
INV-2087_AeroBatt.pdf
“Ship Date: December 31, 2024”p. 1
“Terms: EXW Casper, WY. Title and risk transfer at Ship Date.”p. 1
GL_Revenue_FY25.xlsx
“Row 412 · JE Date 01/06/2025 · $12,684.50”row 412
Activity
DA
Daniel Alberson flagged this for review· 2h ago
“Confirmed with client — EXW terms control. Drafting AJE to move $12,684.50 from FY25 to FY24.”
BR
bryce uploaded GL_Revenue_FY25.xlsx· 6h ago
CH
Chris Wysocki ran cutoff agent· 1d ago
Result: 1 of 12 samples flagged · agent took 8.4s
AeroBatt DefenseINVOICEINV-2087BILL TOCasper Power Holdings, Inc.4119 Industrial PkwyCasper, WY 82604INVOICE DATEDecember 28, 2024PURCHASE ORDERPO-241231-2087SHIP DATEDecember 31, 2024SKUDESCRIPTIONQTYUNITAMOUNTNMC811NMC811 Battery Cell · 4.2 Ah78$155.00$12,090.00THERMKITThermal management kit1$525.00$525.00FREIGHTOutbound freight1$69.50$69.50Subtotal$12,615.00Tax$69.50Total Due$12,684.50SHIPPING TERMSEXW Casper, WY · Title and risk of loss transfer to buyer at Ship Date · Net 30123
Citation 1 of 2 · Ship Date
Page 1 / 1100%
LaVell Edwards & CoFinancial Statement AuditD24-92
Task
Review
Utah Hurricane AuthorityNotes to the Basic Financial Statements · December 31, 2025 and 2024Note 4. InvestmentsInterest and investment income for the years ended December 31:20252024U.S. Treasury obligations$ 198,412,610$ 168,914,612Corporate bonds88,742,31874,221,484Supranational bonds724,508600,803Municipal bond58,94049,361Money market7,914,6506,728,171Total interest income295,853,026250,514,431Change in fair value of investments94,621,80274,366,683Less interest expense and issuance costs on revenue bonds(22,498,144)(20,012,844)Less investment expenses(4,231,936)(3,253,824)Total$ 363,744,748$ 301,614,446Reconciliation to Statements of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position20252024Investment income on bond proceeds — net of related expenses$ 9,148,206IC-47,693,741IC-4Net investment income363,744,748IC-5293,920,705Total$ 372,892,954$ 301,614,446SUGGESTED×IC-5APPLYIC29See accompanying independent auditor's report and notes.
29/ 55100%

Trusted by audit teams at

JLK RosenbergerLarson & CompanyRichey MayRSM Ebner StolzStambaugh Ness

What is a punchcard?

A new unit of audit work.

A punchcard is a structured piece of audit work — a request, a test, a review step — with everything it needs to be completed and traced back to evidence. Send one to a client. An agent completes it. You review it. Together, punchcards make up the complete work of the audit.

1. Send

A structured request with selections, support types, and fields to extract. Clients see exactly what's needed — and get instant feedback when something doesn't tie out.

Punchcard sent — FY26
  • Invoice — Selection #042
  • Bank statement — Selection #042
  • AR aging — doesn’t tie to TB
  • Shipping doc — Selection #042

2. Complete

An AI agent reads the evidence, extracts the fields, runs the comparisons, and prepares the workpaper with citations. Mechanical work runs at scale. Judgment stays with the auditor.

Prompt
match invoice total to GL // account for early-pay discount
Cell results
Tick
#040$12,450.00
F&G
#041$8,210.00
F&G
#042$3,120.00
Δ$312

3. Review

Every cell carries a reasoning trace and clickable citation. Validate, override, comment, and sign off — then export standardized workpapers without leaving the spreadsheet.

Workpaper.xlsx · Sheet 1
B4
$12,450.00
Source
B5
$8,210.00
Source
B6
$3,120.00
Source
One click → reasoning trace + source evidence

Flagship capability

Co-audit: substantive testing in minutes.

Co-audit is the first punchcard most firms send. Plain English in, audit workpapers with citations out. Up to 10× efficiency on substantive testing — without giving up judgment, traceability, or review.

Reads the documents your auditors do

Contracts, invoices, bank statements, payroll, debt agreements, revenue documents, offering memos. Extracts the fields and runs the comparisons.

Cites back to source evidence

Every conclusion is inspectable. One click takes you to the exact page, the exact line, the exact paragraph the agent reasoned from.

Built for substantive testing — and SOX

Great at substantive testing, revenue and expense testing, search for unrecorded liabilities, and operating-effectiveness testing of SOX controls.

More punchcards in the system

One system. Every kind of audit work.

Co-audit is one capability. The same operating system handles matching, testing, financial statement review, and more — each one a punchcard your team can send, complete, or review.

The matching punchcard.

Match Agent ties every selection to its supporting evidence — invoice to PO to receiving report, payment to bank statement, contract to revenue entry — without the manual hunt.

  • Three-way matches at scale
  • Flags missing or mismatched support on upload
  • Exports tie-out tables ready for review
Explore Match Agent

The testing punchcard.

Test Agent runs your audit procedures across every sample — extracting fields, comparing values, applying tolerances, generating tick marks, and citing the source for every conclusion.

  • Procedure templates per assertion
  • Tolerances and exceptions flagged
  • Reasoning trace on every cell
Explore Test Agent

The FSR punchcard.

Financial Statement Review reads the draft financials, ties balances to the trial balance, checks disclosure completeness, and surfaces inconsistencies between the notes and the numbers.

  • TB-to-FS tie-out
  • Disclosure checklist coverage
  • Cross-section consistency checks
Explore Financial Statement Review

Who it's for

Built for the audit work you actually do.

One operating system. Same evidence, same testing, same review surface — whether you're signing the opinion or running the internal audit plan.

For external audit

CPA firms running assurance engagements.

Streamline client requests, evidence collection, substantive testing, and workpaper preparation. Keep professional judgment in your hands and turn engagement weeks into days.

  • Per-selection client request flows
  • Substantive testing with citations
  • Reviewable, exportable workpapers

For internal audit

In-house teams across operational, financial, and IT audit.

Standardize procedures, automate evidence gathering and testing, and free your team for risk-based judgment work. Strong at operating-effectiveness testing of SOX controls.

  • Standardized procedure templates
  • SOX-controls testing with traceable evidence
  • One workspace for evidence, testing, and review

What auditors are saying about Co-audit

In her first day using Co-audit, a senior at Richey May completed revenue testing across 41 selections and 123 supporting documents in 30 minutes — work that would normally take days to do manually.

Co-audit gives our auditors back the hours that don't require professional judgment, so they can spend more time where the risk actually lives.

SC

Steve Checketts

Partner, Richey May

Read the case study

For a new classification standard on insurance investment bonds, I had Co-audit scan 12,750 pages of offering memos across 15 selections and quote the sections supporting each classification, against a flowchart I wrote. That isn't a procedure we would have attempted manually.

Co-audit didn't just make the work faster — it let us do work we wouldn't have done at all.

PB

Paige Bassoli

Associate, JLK Rosenberger

Read the case study

Assurance, one punchcard at a time.

See Punchcard handle a real engagement. We'll walk through requests, testing, and review using your evidence — every judgment call still in human hands.

Trusted by RSM, Richey May, JLK Rosenberger, and more.